We’re so conditioned by political correctness to think of the gender gap in terms of who does better among female voters (an attitude rooted in the politically correct thesis that the preferences of male voters are somehow less legitimate than those of female voters) that few seem to have noticed or pointed out that Hillary Clinton is suffering from a huge gender gap among male voters. The latest poll of Democratic voters nationwide showed her with 29% support among men, compared to 60% for Obama.

And that’s Democratic men. Imagine how poorly she’ll do among men who aren’t Democrats, if that’s all she can get from Democratic men, who are presumably more open to the idea of a female president than the overall male population. If she were doing better among men, even if only white men, she’d probably still be the frontrunner. Her appeals to female solidarity, and the fact that she has pushed away and alienated male voters, has cost her dearly.

Many of Obama’s supporters are even worse than some of the Clinton supporters we’ve seen. They remind me of pre-teen girls at a rock concert, just a lot of mindless shouting and screaming. The dangerous thing for Obama is that, like those pre-teen girls, the type of support he has is very shallow and fickle. In a couple of years, when they grow up, the pre-teen girls ditch the acts they loved at 13, and Obama faces the danger that the type of voters he has will do the same.

I see what you mean. But the Obamites are scarier still.

The only one without a Koolaid following is McCain.